Adoption as adaptation: Household decision making and changing rural livelihoods in Lombok, Indonesia

In agricultural research for development adoption of new technology tends to be cast in categories: adoption, partial adoption, dis-adoption or non-adoption. While these may serve for pragmatic classification and measures for project success or impact they fail to properly acknowledge the ongoing and independent efforts of farmers (and others) in experimentation and integration of knowledge across a range of sources. This paper explores responses to practices for cattle management introduced during a research project, at project close, and five years after the project has finished. We consider the perceptions and application of new knowledge by farmers, extension staff, and policy makers. By taking a longer-term view, we demonstrate how farming households adapt and integrate knowledge from different sources into their daily practice, influenced by local institutions and changing cultural expectations, as well as external researchers. We also consider the influence of changing government priorities and incentives in steering farm-management decisions. Results suggest that a focus on measures to build capacity and empower farmers with information to adapt and respond to change, regardless of project activities, is a much more important goal and indicator of impact than measuring adoption.

Automated summary

This paper explores the responses to cattle management practices introduced during a research project and examines the perceptions and application of new knowledge by farmers, extension staff, and policy makers. By taking a longer-term view, it demonstrates how farming households adapt and integrate knowledge from different sources into their daily practice. The focus on building capacity and empowering farmers with information to adapt and respond to change is considered a more important goal and indicator of impact than measuring adoption.