4.7 Article

Seasonal gentrification and its (dis)contents: Exploring the temporalities of rural change in a Turkish small town

Journal

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 482-493

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Fund of the University of Leuven [GOA 13/04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the temporalities of rural gentrification using a case-study in A.glasun, Turkey. It compares the influx of seasonal gentrifiers and their material and experiential effects, finding differences in experiential displacement pressure among different groups. The study highlights the importance of temporal dimensions in understanding gentrification's effects.
This paper joins in with the discussion on the temporalities of rural gentrification. Based on a case-study in the rural town of A.glasun in South-West Anatolia, Turkey, we compare the influx of diverse groups of seasonal gentrifiers (second home users, students, tourists) and its material and experiential effects. Although actual material displacement was generally found to be limited, experiential displacement pressure did differ amongst the three groups. Our findings indicate the importance of the temporal dimensions of gentrification in understanding its differential effects. We identified four key dimensions which determined the effects and perceptions of seasonal gentrification in A.glasun: The three groups did not only differ according to the periodicity of their migration, but also in their rhythms of everyday life. In addition, the particularity of our case study revealed the importance of two additional temporal dimensions: the impermanence of gentrifiers' residence, as well as the historical sequence of events gentrification is embedded in. Both significantly influence the evaluation of gentrification's costs and benefits by long-term residents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available