4.7 Review

Just transition: A conceptual review

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291

Keywords

Just transition; Energy transition; Low-carbon transition; Conceptual review

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [12600718]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review examined various perspectives surrounding the concept of just transition, identifying five main themes and emphasizing the need for more empirical studies, discussion on the relationship between different concepts, expansion of geographical scope, and attention to power dynamics.
The growing attention paid to the idea of a just transition away from the incumbent fossil fuel energy paradigm has led scholars to devise diverse definitions, understandings, and viewpoints of the term. This review seeks to clarify the different perspectives surrounding the concept, to consolidate knowledge, and to provide a concise account of current debates in the literature as well as a research agenda. It identifies five themes around which the concept has been discussed: (1) just transition as a labor-oriented concept, (2) just transition as an integrated framework for justice, (3) just transition as a theory of socio-technical transition, (4) just transition as a governance strategy, and (5) just transition as public perception. Overall, this review suggests that the literature on just transition employs rich theoretical and empirical insights from various disciplines yet contains several gaps. Specifically, it argues that the literature would benefit from more empirical studies rooted in practice, more discussion on the relationship between different concepts of just transition, an expansion of geographical scope to include developing countries and non-democratic regimes, and more attention to power dynamics in just transition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available