Journal
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 749-759Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab093
Keywords
Behavior change technique; Diabetes; Fidelity; Intervention; Prevention; Receipt
Categories
Funding
- National Institute for Health Research [Health Services and Delivery Research] [16/48/07]
- DIPLOMA research program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This qualitative study investigates the understanding of self-regulatory behavior change techniques (BCTs) in the NHS Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) among participants. The results show that there is a wide variation in understanding for some BCTs, particularly in action planning and problem solving. The study suggests that behavioral interventions should provide necessary support to help participants better understand and apply these techniques.
Background The National Health Service (NHS) Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a nationally implemented behavioral intervention for adults at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes in England, based on a program specification that stipulates inclusion of 19 specific behavior change techniques (BCTs). Previous work has identified drift in fidelity from these NHS England specifications through providers' program manuals, training, and delivery, especially in relation to BCTs targeting self-regulatory processes. Purpose This qualitative study investigates intervention receipt, i.e., how the self-regulatory BCT content of the NHS-DPP is understood by participants. Methods Twenty participants from eight NHS-DPP locations were interviewed; topics included participants' understanding of self-monitoring of behavior, goal setting, feedback, problem solving, and action planning. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using the framework method. Results There was a wide variation in understanding among participants for some BCTs, as well as between BCTs. Participants described their understanding of self-monitoring of behaviors with ease and valued BCTs focused on outcomes (weight loss). Some participants learned how to set appropriate behavioral goals. Participants struggled to recall action planning or problem solving or found these techniques challenging to understand, unless additional support was provided (e.g., through group discussion). Conclusions Participants' lack of understanding of some self-regulatory BCTs is consistent with the drift across fidelity domains previously identified from NHS design specifications. Behavioral interventions should build-in necessary support for participants to help them understand some BCTs such as action planning and problem solving. Alternatively, these self-regulatory BCTs may be intrinsically difficult to use for this population.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available