4.5 Article

The effect of Ca/Mg/Zn mixing ratio on the research octane number of bio-gasoline during basic soap pyrolysis

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08314

Keywords

Pyrolysis; Bio-gasoline; Metal soap; Hydrocarbon; Research octane number

Funding

  1. Indonesian Oil Palm Estate Fund Agency (BPDPKS) under GRS-K20 Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pyrolysis is used to convert oleic basic soap into gasoline-compatible fuel by reacting oleic acid with metal hydroxides. The study found that the highest RON value (89.6) was achieved at 450 degrees Celsius using a Ca/Mg/Zn ratio of 0.15:0.85:1. The pyrolysis process produced bio-hydrocarbon, solid residue, water, and gas with varying compositions of hydrocarbon compounds.
Pyrolysis is one of the available technologies to convert oleic basic soap into gasoline-compatible fuel. In this research, the process mentioned was applied using the mixture of Ca, Mg, Zn in the production of oleic basic soap. The reactions were carried out in a batch glass reactor at atmospheric pressure at the temperature of 450 degrees C. Meanwhile, the basic soaps were made by reacting oleic acid mixed with metal hydroxides. The parameters observed were the Research Octane Number (RON) of bio-gasoline and the hydrocarbon content in the liquid product. The higher the octane number is, the better gasoline resists detonation and the smoother the engine runs. As observed, pyrolysis of oleic basic soap produced gasoline range hydrocarbon. GC-DHA results indicated that the highest RON (89.6) was achieved with Ca/Mg/Zn ratio of 0.15:0.85:1 (Ca-metal ratio of 0.15 mol). The products of the pyrolysis process comprised bio-hydrocarbon, solid residue, water, and gas. The bio-hydrocarbon contents were paraffin (5.9 wt%), iso-paraffin (31.3 wt%), olefin (18.5 wt%), naphthene (25.3 wt%), and aromatic compounds (15.3 wt%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available