4.5 Article

Lashing out: emotional exhaustion triggers retaliatory incivility in the workplace

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08694

Keywords

Retaliatory incivility; Emotional exhaustion; Job satisfaction; Work withdrawal; Structural equation modelling

Funding

  1. Edith Cowan University (FHES Collaborative Research Grant Scheme)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incivility in the workplace is a growing problem that affects employees and organizations. Current literature lacks an integrated theoretical model to explain workplace incivility. This study tested a model combining the Spiral Theory of Incivility with the Conservation of Resource Theory to explain the relationship between engaged and retaliatory workplace incivility.
Incivility in the workplace is a growing problem in many workplaces that can detrimentally affect employees and organisations. Despite this increasing problem, the current literature on incivility lacks an integrated theoretical model to explain engaged and retaliated incivility in the workplace. To address this gap, we tested a model which incorporated both Spiral Theory of Incivility with Conservation of Resource Theory to explain the underlying processes involve in the relationship between engaged and retaliatory workplace incivility. Specifically, retaliatory incivility was hypothesised as an influencing factor, work withdrawal and job dissatisfaction as consequences, and emotional exhaustion as a moderator. A total of 875 employees in multinational organisations across three countries were panel surveyed. The overall result from the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) indicated that the fit indices for the proposed model fulfilled all recommended levels. Importantly, emotional exhaustion was found to be the trigger point in the negative spiral of workplace incivility. Theoretical implications and practical considerations were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available