4.6 Article

Shifting moods on Sina Weibo: The first 12 weeks of COVID-19 in Wuhan

Journal

NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14614448211058850

Keywords

China; citizenship; computational linguistics; COVID-19; sentiment analysis; Sina Weibo; social media

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41901178]
  2. Ministry of Education in China Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences [19YJCZH158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tracks the evolution of public sentiment on social media platform Sina Weibo in Wuhan, China, during the first 12 weeks after the identification of COVID-19. It finds a progression from confusion/fear to happiness/gratitude, indicating the significant impact of social media usage on digital medical citizenship and disaster management.
Better understanding of social media uses in crisis situations can help improve disaster management by policy-makers, organizations, businesses, and members of the public. It can also build theoretical understanding of how social life and citizenship incorporate social media usage. This study tracks the evolution of public sentiment in Wuhan, China, during the first 12 weeks after the identification of COVID-19 on the Chinese microblogging platform Sina Weibo. Data consist of 133,079 original Sina Weibo posts dealing with the novel coronavirus. The relative prevalence of eight different emotion groups is traced longitudinally using the ROST Content Mining System and the Emotion Vocabulary of Dalian University of Technology. The study finds a progression from confusion/fear, to disappointment/frustration, to depression/anxiety, then finally to happiness/gratitude. It argues that this progression indexes the changing affective energies of digital medical citizenship, which in turn indicates the context for intervention in future crises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available