4.7 Article

Consumption-based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile

Journal

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 1123-1137

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2945

Keywords

Chile; consumption-based CO2 emissions; economic growth; financial development; renewable energy consumption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that financial development and renewable energy consumption reduce consumption-based CO2 emissions in Chile, while economic growth and electricity consumption increase carbon emissions. Encouraging research and development of low-carbon technologies and renewable energy investments, while reducing consumption of nonrenewable energy sources, should be a focus for policymakers.
This paper aims to investigate the effect of financial development and renewable energy consumption on consumption-based CO2 emissions in Chile while controlling for economic growth and electricity consumption. Based on the aim of the paper, autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds with Kripfganz and Schneider's (2018) approximations, fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS), and gradual shift causality tests are applied in this study. The outcomes clearly reveal that while financial development and renewable energy consumption reduce the consumption-based CO2 emissions in Chile, economic growth and electricity consumption increase consumption-based carbon emissions. The gradual shift causality test provides consistent results with ARDL, FMOLS, and DOLS estimators. Therefore, policymakers in Chile should dynamically encourage the research and development of low-carbon technologies and renewable energy investments while imported nonrenewable energy sources level should be targeted, and especially those sectors which are more energy-intensive and causing to increase in consumption-based CO2 emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available