4.7 Review

Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethics; Digital ethics; Digital technologies and archetypes; PRISMA; Systematic literature review; Ontological framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducts a systematic literature review to critically discuss the ethical implications of using AI in Digital Technologies beyond high-level principles. It identifies 14 digital ethics implications and presents a conceptual model highlighting the impact of digital ethics on societal impact.
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Digital technologies (DT) is proliferating a profound socio-technical transformation. Governments and AI scholarship have endorsed key AI principles but lack direction at the implementation level. Through a systematic literature review of 59 papers, this paper contributes to the critical debate on the ethical use of AI in DTs beyond high-level AI principles. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that identifies 14 digital ethics implications for the use of AI in seven DT archetypes using a novel ontological framework (physical, cognitive, information, and governance). The paper presents key findings of the review and a conceptual model with twelve propositions highlighting the impact of digital ethics implications on societal impact, as moderated by DT archetypes and mediated by organisational impact. The implications of intelligibility, accountability, fairness, and autonomy (under the cognitive domain), and privacy (under the information domain) are the most widely discussed in our sample. Furthermore, ethical implications related to the governance domain are shown to be generally applicable for most DT archetypes. Implications under the physical domain are less prominent when it comes to AI diffusion with one exception (safety). The key findings and resulting conceptual model have academic and professional implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available