4.3 Article

Exploring everyday state attachment dynamics in middle childhood

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579421001784

Keywords

attachment; intra-individual variation; parent-child; middle childhood; state attachment

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G077415, G075718]
  2. Research Fund KU Leuven [C14/16/040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the dynamics of secure state attachment expectations in middle childhood and found that daily fluctuations in state attachment are (partially) self-predictive. The study also found that experiencing effective support during distress is associated with increases in secure state attachment.
The current study explored dynamics of secure state attachment expectations in everyday life in middle childhood, specifically state attachment carry-over and reactivity to experiences of caregiver support in the context of stress. In two independent samples (one community sample, N = 123; one adoption sample, N = 69), children (8-12 years) daily reported on their state attachment for respectively 14 and 7 consecutive days. Additionally, they reported daily on their experiences of distress and subsequent experiences of caregiver support. Results in both samples indicated that secure state attachment on a day-to-day basis is characterized by a significant positive carry-over effect, suggesting that state attachment fluctuations are (partially) self-predictive. In Study 1, experiencing no support following distress significantly related to intraindividual decreases in secure state attachment; in Study 2, experiencing effective support during distress related to intra-individual increases in secure state attachment. Taken together, the current studies provide novel and important insights into how state attachment temporally evolves on a day-to-day basis in middle childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available