4.3 Review

Validated HIV Knowledge Scales for Use with Youth and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 1695-1715

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03521-4

Keywords

HIV; AIDS; Measurement; Validation; Reliability; Knowledge

Funding

  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI50410]
  2. National Research Service Award (NRSA) Predoctoral Traineeship from the Agency for Healthcare research and Quality [2T32 HS000032-30]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge about HIV is crucial for prevention and management. This systematic review highlights validated HIV knowledge scales, with most studies conducted in the last decade. The majority of studies reported reliability or validity.
HIV knowledge - the information a person possesses about HIV - is essential for the prevention and management of HIV. Therefore, the accurate measurement of HIV knowledge is important for both science and practice. This systematic review identifies extant HIV knowledge scales that have been validated with adolescent and adult populations and summarizes the state of this research. We searched seven electronic databases, which resulted in 6,525 articles. After title/abstract and full-text review, 27 studies remained and underwent qualitative review of reported scale psychometric properties. Many studies were conducted in the last decade (n = 12), reflecting advances in scientific knowledge of HIV. Five were exclusively adolescent-based studies (sample age <= 18). Most studies reported reliability (n = 25) or at least one form of validity (n = 21). Future studies should develop or refine HIV knowledge scales so that they reflect recent scientific developments, use rigorous psychometric testing, and target samples that include those persons at highest risk for HIV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available