4.3 Article

Empathic Validation in Physician-Patient Communication: An Approach to Conveying Empathy for Problems With Uncertain Solutions

Journal

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 413-425

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10497323211056312

Keywords

empathy; conversation analysis; older adults; physician-patient interaction; primary care; healthcare communication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interest in systematic approaches to improving clinical empathy is increasing, with a focus on empathic validation as a communication strategy. Empathic validations must demonstrate shared understanding and support the patient's position to be effective, particularly in situations where there is no medical solution. Empathic validation is a useful approach for older adults as it does not rely on their ability to create empathic opportunities.
Interest in systematic approaches to improving clinical empathy has increased. However, conceptualizations of empathy are inconsistent and difficult to operationalize. Drawing on video recordings of primary care visits with older adults, I describe one particular communication strategy for conveying empathy-empathic validation. Using conversation analysis, I show that the design of empathic validations and the context in which they are delivered are critical to positive patient responses. Effective empathic validations must (a) demonstrate shared understanding and (b) support the patient's position. Physicians provided empathic validation when there was no medical solution to offer and within this context, for three purposes: (1) normalizing changes in health, (2) acknowledging individual difficulty, and (3) recognizing actions or choices. Empathic validation is a useful approach because it does not rely on patients' ability to create an empathic opportunity and has particular relevance for older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available