4.6 Article

Space at home and psychological distress during the Covid-19 lockdown in Italy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101747

Keywords

Perceived stress; COVID-19; Restricted movement; Satisfaction with the space at home; Crowding; Perceived risk of COVID-19 infection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between perceived stress and the objective and subjective dimensions of the home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicate that objective home crowding has an indirect effect on perceived stress through satisfaction with the space at home. These effects are more pronounced in younger generations. Additionally, satisfaction with the space at home is negatively associated with perceived stress, especially when the perceived risk of COVID-19 infection is low.
Prolonged periods of restrictions on people's freedom of movement during the first massive wave of the COVID19 pandemic meant that most people engaged in all their daily activities at home. This suggested the need for the spatial features of the home and its occupants' perception of them to be investigated in terms of people's wellbeing. The present study was conducted on a large sample (N = 1354) drawn from different Italian regions. It examined the relationship between the objective and subjective dimensions of the home, measured in terms of objective home crowding and satisfaction with the space at home, in relation to perceived stress and the perceived risk of COVID-19 infection during the lockdown. The results showed that perceived stress is influenced by objective home crowding through the mediation of satisfaction with the space at home. These associations were more pronounced in younger generations. The negative association between satisfaction with the space at home and perceived stress was higher, the lower the perceived COVID-19 risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available