4.5 Article

Human-Centered Design of an Advance Care Planning Group Visit for Mild Cognitive Impairment

Journal

GERONTOLOGIST
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 1226-1237

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab181

Keywords

Dementia; End-of-life care planning; Stakeholder engagement

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [K76AG054782]
  2. Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
  3. Development and Informatics Service Center (DISC) grant support (NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI) [UL1 RR025780]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the iterative design of a group visit-based intervention for individuals with MCI and evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Despite positive ratings of acceptability from participants, there is a need to enhance recruitment feasibility to support implementation in clinical settings.
Background and Objectives While advance care planning (ACP) is critical for ensuring optimal end-of-life outcomes among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), many individuals who may benefit from ACP have not initiated this process. This article aims to describe the iterative design of an MCI group visit-based intervention and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Research Design and Methods We used human-centered design, rapid-cycle prototyping, and multiple methods to adapt an ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention. We convened an advisory panel of persons with MCI and care partners (n = 6 dyads) to refine the intervention and conducted a single-arm pilot of 4 MCI ENACT intervention prototypes (n = 13 dyads). We used surveys and interviews to assess outcomes from multiple perspectives. Results The advisory panel affirmed that ACP is a priority for individuals with MCI, described the need for ACP in a group setting, and suggested refinements to ACP resources for the MCI ENACT intervention. Feasibility of recruitment was limited. MCI ENACT intervention participants strongly agreed that group discussions provided useful information and recommended the intervention. Themes supporting acceptability included (a) feedback on acceptability of the intervention, (b) previous experiences with ACP, and (c) reasons for participation, including desire for discussions about MCI and how it relates to ACP. Discussion and Implications Despite stakeholders' positive ratings of acceptability of the MCI ENACT intervention, future work is needed to enhance the feasibility of recruitment to support implementation into clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available