4.6 Article

Does R&D intensity promote the adoption of circular supply chain management? Evidence from China

Journal

INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 153-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.10.015

Keywords

CSCM; Circular economy; Innovation; Institutional theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [71902159]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the relationship between R&D intensity and CSCM adoption in high-tech manufacturing companies in China, finding that R&D intensity positively impacts firms' CSCM adoption, especially when state-owned shares or industry competition are higher.
This paper explores the relationship between research and development (R&D) intensity and circular supply chain management (CSCM) adoption of high-tech manufacturing companies in China to deepen our understanding of how to improve CSCM adoption in emerging economies. In particular, we examine the moderating effect of three kinds of institutional pressures (i.e., regulatory pressure from governmental regulations, mimetic pressure from industry competition, and normative pressure from overseas customer demand) from the perspective of institutional theory. Based on the panel data of 310 Chinese listed companies from 2006 to 2019, we find that R&D intensity positively affects firms' CSCM adoption. We further observe that this positive effect is strengthened when the ratio of state-owned shares or the degree of industry competition is higher. However, overseas operating income does not affect the impact of R&D intensity on CSCM adoption. Our study contributes to the literature on the innovation - circular economy debate, confirming the positive effect of R&D intensity on firms' CSCM adoption, and provides insights into moderating effects on this relationship in an emerging economy context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available