4.8 Review

Religion as a social shaping force in entrepreneurship and business: Insights from a technology-empowered systematic literature review

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121393

Keywords

Religion; Bibliometric analysis; Performance analysis; Science mapping; Co-occurrence analysis; PageRank analysis; Systematic literature review; SPAR-4-SLR; Business; Entrepreneurship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Religion is recognized as a significant force shaping entrepreneurship and business activities, with existing research focusing on its influence on consumerism, corporate social responsibility, and other aspects. Future research can further investigate the relationship between religion and business education, marketing, and other fields.
Religion is widely regarded as a social force that shapes entrepreneurship and business (EB) activity, behavior, and practice. However, a holistic review of religion and EB literature remains elusive, which could impede the field's advancement when competing arguments are introduced and pure replications are pursued. Therefore, this study conducts a technology-empowered systematic literature review using a combination of fit-for-purpose bibliometric software to examine the state of the literature on religion and EB research. The review reveals that existing research in the field have mainly focused on how religions such as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Islam influence consumerism, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, leadership orientation, organizational culture, financial and social ethics, and socioeconomic development, and that future research can enrich the field by investigating religion in tandem with business education, marketing, economics and public policy, and cognitive characteristics and behavioral inclinations, as well as the reversed influence of EB on religious orientation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available