4.8 Article

Managing shifts to value-based healthcare and value digitalization as a multi-level dynamic capability development process

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121072

Keywords

Value; Digitalization; Dynamic capability; Healthcare; Clinicians

Funding

  1. RMIT University Enabling Capability Development seed fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As value-based healthcare (VBHC) and digital health gain increasing attention, hospitals need to undergo organizational changes, balance internal conflicting processes, and establish new dynamic capabilities.
Hospital care worldwide changes with the needs and expectations of patients, caregivers, clinicians, and com-munities. Given that the value-based healthcare (VBHC) approach and the digital technology's role to add value receive increasing attention, the literature provides compelling evidence of their advantages for patients and healthcare transformation generally. Shifts to VBHC and digital health require hospitals to undertake organi-zational changes, balance countervailing processes within their organizations, and build new dynamic capabil-ities. Yet, the literature remains silent about managing shifts to VBHC and digital health. By focusing on perspectives of public healthcare service providers, this research conducted a qualitative study of a major Eu-ropean public hospital's cardiology department. Building on the multi-level theory of dynamic capability, this research shows that the development of new capabilities in healthcare occurs by linking micro-levels (individual levels) and macro-levels (hospital levels) through a constructive dialogue at the meso-level (department and interdepartmental level) and by acknowledging the improvement processes' iterative nature. The paper con-tributes with new insights on managing and digitalizing VBHC as a multi-level dynamic capability development process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available