Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Epistemic Standards for Participatory Technology Assessment: Suggestions Based Upon Well-Ordered Science
Juan M. Duran et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2020)
A close examination of the role and needed expertise of brokers in bridging and building science policy boundaries in environmental decision making
Ronlyn Duncan et al.
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)
Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy
Jason Chilvers et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2020)
Understanding Public Responses to Emerging Technologies: A Narrative Approach
Phil Macnaghten et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING (2019)
Governing with ambivalence: The tentative origins of socio-technical integration
Erik Fisher
RESEARCH POLICY (2019)
Enhancing Socio-technical Governance: Targeting Inequality in Innovation Through Inclusivity Mainstreaming
Logan D. A. Williams et al.
MINERVA (2019)
Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach
Rob Bellamy et al.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2017)
Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists 'open up' appraisal of geoengineering
Rob Bellamy et al.
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2016)
Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse
Jason Chilvers et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING (2016)
Public Participation Organizations and Open Policy: A Constitutional Moment for British Democracy?
Helen Pallett
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION (2015)
Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement: A European Study
Steven B. Emery et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2015)
Questioning the technological fix to climate change - Lay sense-making of geoengineering in Sweden
Victoria Wibeck et al.
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE (2015)
Why should we promote public engagement with science?
Jack Stilgoe et al.
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2014)
'Opening up' geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change
Rob Bellamy et al.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2013)
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Jack Stilgoe et al.
RESEARCH POLICY (2013)
Policy pathways, policy networks, and citizen deliberation: Disseminating the results of World Wide Views on Global Warming in the USA
Jason Delborne et al.
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY (2013)
A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology
Eva Lovbrand et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2011)
Deliberative decision-making on radioactive waste management in Finland, France and the UK: influence of mixed forms of deliberation in the macro discursive context
Markku Lehtonen
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES (2010)
Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement
Ulrike Felt et al.
MINERVA (2010)
Qualitative research and deliberative methods: promise or peril?
Robert Evans et al.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (2009)
Opening up and Closing down - Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology
Andy Stirling
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2008)
Shifting subject positions - Experts and lay people in public dialogue
Anne Kerr et al.
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE (2007)
Lessons learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program (ELSI): Planning societal implications research for the National Nanotechnology Program
Erik Fisher
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY (2005)
A typology of public engagement mechanisms
G Rowe et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2005)
How science makes environmental controversies worse
D Sarewitz
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY (2004)
Knowledge systems for sustainable development
DW Cash et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2003)
Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science
S Jasanoff
MINERVA (2003)
A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: a multicriteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop
A Stirling et al.
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY (2001)