4.8 Article

Motives to Publish, to Patent and to Standardize: An Explorative Study Based on Individual Engineers' Assessments

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121420

Keywords

scientific publications; patenting; standardization; industrial researchers; automotive research; motivational research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines engineers' motivation for scientific publications, patenting, and contribution to standardization using the concepts of 'Gold', 'Ribbon', and 'Puzzle'. The study is based on a survey of engineers employed by two German OEMs in the automotive sector. The findings suggest that engineers prioritize intrinsic satisfaction over financial rewards and career reputation, while financial rewards are generally of lower importance and not relevant to standardization contributions. Comparing these motivations with researchers in public research organizations, the study highlights the role of regulatory framework conditions and intra-organizational structures in driving engineers' intrinsic motivations. Implications for companies and public research organizations' incentives and support schemes are discussed.
This paper employs the concept of 'Gold' (financial rewards), 'Ribbon' (reputational/career rewards) and 'Puzzle' (intrinsic satisfaction) to structure engineers' motivation for pursuing scientific publications, patenting and contributing to standardization. This study is based on the responses to a survey of engineers employed by two German Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) active in the automotive sector. Based on three explorative factor analyses, we identify in the first step factors of motives related to publishing, patenting and standardization. In the second step, we assign these factors to the three categories 'Gold', 'Ribbon' and 'Puzzle'. We find that the engineers surveyed assign a lower overall importance to career rewards and reputation and a higher importance to intrinsic satisfaction, while financial rewards are of lower importance, in general, and not at all relevant for contributions to standardization. In comparing these 'motivations with the drivers for researchers in public research organizations, we identify the role of regulatory framework conditions and intra-organizational structures in particular for researchers' intrinsic motivations. Finally, we derive some implications for companies', but also public research organizations' incentives and support schemes focusing on researchers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available