4.5 Article

Avoiding gender ambiguous pronouns in French

Journal

COGNITION
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104909

Keywords

Language production; Ambiguity avoidance; Referential communication; Pronoun; Semantic similarity; Grammatical gender

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that speakers tend to avoid using pronouns when human referents have the same gender, but are more likely to avoid using pronouns with grammatical-gender ambiguity when there is semantic similarity between non-human referents. Additionally, in a non-linguistic context, speakers are more likely to ignore the grammatical-gender ambiguity of a pronoun and base their choice on non-linguistic competition among referents.
Across many languages, pronouns are the most frequently produced referring expressions. We examined whether and how speakers avoid referential ambiguity that arises when the gender of a pronoun is compatible with more than one entity in the context in French. Experiment 1 showed that speakers use fewer pronouns when human referents have the same gender than when they had different genders, but grammatical gender congruence between inanimate referents did not result in fewer pronouns. Experiment 2 showed that semantic similarity between non-human referents can enhance the likelihood that speakers avoid grammatical-gender ambiguous pronouns. Experiment 3 pitched grammatical gender ambiguity avoidance against the referents' competition in the non-linguistic context, showing that when speakers can base their pronoun choice on non-linguistic competition, they ignore the pronoun's grammatical gender ambiguity even when the referents are semantically related. The results thus indicated that speakers preferentially produce referring expressions based on nonlinguistic information; they are more likely to be affected by the referents' non-linguistic similarity than by the linguistic ambiguity of a pronoun.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available