What makes cities livable? Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness in different contexts

Shaping livable cities is an enduring issue for urban planning, which came dramatically to the forefront of relevant policies with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study explores what makes cities livable by using neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness as measures of urban livability. The determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness are examined and compared, using geospatial and survey data from two cities, one from the South and the other from the North European context: Thessaloniki, Greece and Oslo, Norway. A structural equation model is developed and tested. In both cities, common determinants of neighborhood satisfaction are found to be the proximity to city center, neighborhood perceived safety, and place attachment, whereas common determinants of neighborhood happiness are found to be neighborhood perceived safety, neighborhood perceived quietness, neighborhood social cohesion, place attachment, and lower neighborhood density. Important differences between the two cities were also observed. Numerous local amenities seem to positively contribute to urban livability in Thessaloniki, but not in Oslo. Parks and trees are positively linked to neighborhood happiness in Oslo, but not in Thessaloniki. These differences support the view that some of the links between neighborhood characteristics and livability depend on the local context related to local culture, attitudes, and preferences, all of which might also be influenced by the local built environment.

Automated summary

This study examines and compares the determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and happiness in Thessaloniki, Greece and Oslo, Norway, using geospatial and survey data. The results show that common determinants of satisfaction are proximity to city center, perceived safety, and place attachment, while common determinants of happiness are perceived safety, perceived quietness, social cohesion, place attachment, and lower density. The study also reveals important differences between the two cities, suggesting that the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and livability depends on the local context.