4.7 Article

Risk aversion in multilevel electricity market models with different congestion pricing regimes

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105701

Keywords

Risk aversion; Zonal pricing; Investment; Electricity markets; Stochastic programming

Categories

Funding

  1. Bavarian State Government, Germany
  2. Emerging Field Initiative (EFI) of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany through the project Sustainable Business Models in Energy Markets
  3. Emerging Talents Initiative (ETI) of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany [Sonderforschungsbereich/Transregio 154]
  5. Dr. Theo and Friedl Scholler Research Center through a Scholler Fellowship
  6. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P001173/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to decarbonization efforts, electricity markets are undergoing fundamental transitions worldwide, leading to increased uncertainty for all participants. This study investigates the impact of risk aversion on investment and market operation using a stochastic multi-level equilibrium model. The results show that risk aversion has a more pronounced effect in a nodal pricing market compared to a market with imperfect locational price signals.
Due to ongoing efforts for decarbonization, electricity markets worldwide are undergoing fundamental transitions, which result in increased uncertainty for all market participants. Against this background, we investigate the impact of risk aversion on investment and market operation in markets with different congestion pricing regimes and multi-level decision making. We develop a stochastic multi-level equilibrium model with risk-averse agents, which includes investment in transmission and generation capacity, market operation, and redispatch. The model can incorporate perfect, as well as imperfect locational price signals and different upper-level expectations about lower-level risk aversion. We apply our model to a stylized two-node example and compare the effects of risk aversion in a system with zonal and nodal pricing, respectively. Our results show that the effect of risk aversion is more pronounced in a market with nodal pricing, compared to a market with imperfect locational price signals. Furthermore, transmission planners that are ignorant about risk aversion of generation companies can induce substantial additional costs, especially in a nodal pricing market.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available