4.7 Article

Revisiting the economic growth-energy consumption nexus: Does globalization matter?

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105472

Keywords

Globalization; Emerging economies; Energy consumption; Economic growth

Categories

Funding

  1. College of Human and Social Futures
  2. University of Newcastle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that energy consumption and economic growth are interdependent, economic and political globalization may hinder economic growth, while social globalization can enhance it. Additionally, globalization interacts with energy consumption to impact economic growth.
This study revisits the economic growth-energy consumption thesis by investigating the impact of economic, social, and political globalization on the economic growth-energy consumption nexus in a panel of 23 emerging economies for the period 1970-2015. The results that emanate from an instrumental variable generalized method of moment model suggest the following: (i) Energy consumption and economic growth are interdependent. (ii) Economic and political globalization retard economic growth, while social globalization increases economic growth. (iii) Economic, social and political globalization have an inverted U-shaped relationship with economic growth. (iv) Economic, social and political globalization interact with energy consumption to retard economic growth. (v) Economic, social and political globalization do not affect energy consumption. (vi) Economic, social and political globalization have a U-shaped relationship with energy consumption. (vii) Economic and social globalization condition economic growth to increase energy consumption, while political globalization moderates the impact of economic growth to reduce energy consumption. The policy implications of these findings for emerging economies are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available