4.7 Article

Burn or let them bury? The net social cost of producing district heating from imported waste

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105713

Keywords

Net social cost analysis; District heating; Externalities; Incineration; Trade; Waste

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Competition Authority [627/2018]
  2. Green Technology and Environmental Economics Program at Umea University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a net social cost framework is used to analyze policy issues related to cross-border trade in waste fuel. The results indicate that using imported waste fuel in a highly efficient CHP in a cold climate is beneficial, and the results are robust to variations in technical, economic, and environmental assumptions.
In this study, a net social cost framework is applied to provide insights on policy issues relating to the cross-border trade in waste fuel. We estimate the net social cost of using imported waste fuel in a highly efficient combined heat and power plant (CHP) in a cold climate by considering both private costs and benefits as well as external costs related to energy production, alternative waste management and fuel transport. We conclude that using imported waste fuel is beneficial from a societal perspective compared to using biofuel, given the wide range of assumptions regarding technical, economic and environmental characteristics. The net social cost is mainly determined by fuel cost advantages and the external cost of greenhouse gas emissions. External costs associated with transports only marginally impact the net social cost of waste imports for incineration. The results are robust to variation in the excess heat utilisation rate, which implies that importing waste for incineration would also be beneficial in countries with warmer climates where district heating networks already exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available