4.7 Article

Historical carbon abatement in the commercial building operation: China versus the US

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105712

Keywords

Commercial building; Carbon dioxide abatement; Carbon abatement efficiency; Energy efficiency improvement; Decomposition analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680020]
  2. Shuimu Tsinghua Scholar Program of Tsinghua University [2019SM139]
  3. National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China [21CJY030, 18BJL034]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2020CDJSK03YJ07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assesses the carbon abatement in commercial building operations in China and the United States, and compares the carbon abatement efficiency of the two countries. The results show that economic efficiency and energy intensity are key factors in reducing CO2 intensity in commercial buildings. Additionally, the study explores paths for energy efficiency improvement in commercial buildings. This study fills a research gap in comparing the historical carbon abatement features in building operations.
Building is the last mile sector in carbon neutrality transition, and commercial buildings have the largest decarbonization potential using current strategies and technologies. This study focused on China and the United States (US) to assess carbon-dioxide (CO2) abatement in commercial building operations at different emission scales and investigate the carbon abatement efficiency of the two countries from 2001 to 2018. The results show that: (i) Economic efficiency and energy intensity are key to reducing CO2 intensity in Chinese and American commercial buildings, respectively; (ii) Generally, CO2 abatement efficiency in China was 1.1-1.9 times that of the US, although CO2 abatement in China and the US in 2001-2018 was close [China: 1451.89 (+/- 549.05) megatons of CO2, US: 1929.84 (+/- 757.36) mega-tons of CO2]; (iii) Ridge regression tested the robustness of CO2 abatement results of the assessment model successfully. Furthermore, the study mapped paths for energy efficiency improvement in commercial buildings in China and the US to explore the strategy that best decarbonizes buildings. Overall, this study covers the research gap on a carbon abatement assessment tool for different economies or regions to compare the historical carbon abatement features on building operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available