4.6 Article

Passive versus active service delivery: Comparing the effects of two parenting interventions on early cognitive development in rural China

Journal

WORLD DEVELOPMENT
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105686

Keywords

Center-based parenting intervention; Home-based parenting intervention; Early cognitive development; Randomized controlled trial; Program participation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71873008, 71703083, 71703084, 71803108]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA002]
  3. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  4. UBS Optimus Foundation
  5. China Medical Board
  6. Bank of East Asia
  7. Huaqiao Foundation
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-HBGDki Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The center-based parenting intervention in rural China did not significantly impact child development outcomes, but did increase caregivers' investments in children and parenting skills. On the other hand, the home-based intervention had a greater impact on child skills compared to the center-based intervention.
We present the results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effects of a free, center based parenting intervention on early cognitive development and parenting practices in 100 rural villages in China. We then compare these effects to a previous trial of a home-based intervention conducted in the same region, using the same parenting curriculum and public service system, accounting for potential differences between the studies. We find that the center-based intervention did not have a significant impact on child development outcomes, but did lead to increases in the material investments, time investments, and parenting skills of caregivers. The average impact of the center-based intervention on child skills and investments in children was significantly smaller than the home-visiting intervention. Analysis of the possible mechanisms suggests that the difference in effects was driven primarily by different patterns of selection into program participation. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available