4.5 Article

Longitudinal change in adolescent hope among recent immigrant Latinx adolescents: Links with adolescent and parent cultural stress, family functioning, emotional well-being, and behavioral health

Journal

CHILD DEVELOPMENT
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages E87-E102

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13694

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Drug Abuse [DA025694]
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [DA025694, 1K01AA028057-01A1]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P2CHD042849]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that adolescent hope increased over time. Higher cultural stress predicted lower initial hope, while higher family functioning predicted higher initial levels of hope and a less steep increase in hope. Increasing hope levels helped improve emotional and behavioral health, and family functioning predicted better health outcomes by influencing hope.
Adolescent hope can promote the emotional and behavioral well-being of Latinx families. Positive family functioning may foster adolescent hope, whereas cultural stress may compromise adolescent hope and well-being. We examined how adolescent hope changed over time, and whether cultural stress and family functioning predicted emotional and behavioral health via adolescent hope intercept and slope. Recent Latinx immigrant adolescents (M-age = 14.51) and parents (M-age = 41.09; N = 302; n = 150 from Los Angeles; n = 152 from Miami) completed measures of above constructs over 3 years (Summer 2010 to Spring 2013). Latent growth curve modeling indicated that adolescent hope increased over time. Higher cultural stress predicted lower initial hope. Higher family functioning predicted higher initial levels of and less steep increase in hope. Increase in hope predicted better emotional and behavioral health. Family functioning predicted better health outcomes by way of hope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available