4.7 Article

Reciprocal Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Interpersonal Personality in Chinese Adolescents

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740026

Keywords

interpersonal personality; parenting styles; filial piety; reciprocal relationship; Chinese adolescents

Funding

  1. Project of the Development of Career Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the reciprocal relations between parenting styles and adolescents' interpersonal personality in China. The results showed that perceived paternal rejection and behavioral controlling could negatively or positively predict adolescents' interpersonal relatedness, while maternal rejection and parental filial piety also played significant roles in influencing adolescents' interpersonal personality. These findings highlight the importance of parenting styles in shaping adolescents' interpersonal relationships and personality development.
This study examined the reciprocal relations between the parenting styles and adolescents' interpersonal personality in China. A total of 722 sixth-grade Chinese junior high school students reported their interpersonal relatedness (IR) personality trait and perceived parenting styles of their parents. Of these students, 411 completed the survey again in eighth grade. One parent of each student rated their parenting styles. The results indicated that perceived paternal rejection negatively predicted adolescents' IR 2 years later, whereas perceived paternal behavioral controlling positively predicted adolescents' IR 2 years later. IR also positively predicted perceived paternal warmth 2 years later. Significant reciprocal association between adolescents' IR and perceived maternal rejection was found. Parent-rated behavioral control negatively predicted adolescents' IR, whereas Parent-rated filial piety positively predicted adolescents' IR. The results were discussed in the Chinese context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available