4.7 Article

Numerical predictions of cratering and scabbing in concrete slabs subjected to projectile impact using a modified version of HJC material model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 61-71

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.04.014

Keywords

Concrete material model; Dynamic tensile behavior; Cratering and scabbing; Perforation; Projectile

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51210012, 51522813, 51321064, 51438003]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB058001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The HJC material model, which has been widely used for numerical predictions of projectile penetration, is modified for the improved numerical simulations of the cratering and scabbing phenomenon in concrete slabs subjected to projectile impact. Four modifications, i.e. the modified yield surface, introduction of the tensile damage, introduction of Lode-angle dependency and modified strain-rate effect, are presented. The modified HJC model is implemented into the finite element code LS-DYNA through user defined material model. The improved performances due to the modifications are firstly demonstrated by single finite element numerical tests. And then several sets of projectile perforation experiments, in which the projectile mass, impact velocity and concrete slab thickness vary, are simulated by the modified HJC model, where corresponding predictions of the original HJC model are also presented to demonstrate the improved simulation of the cratering and scabbing phenomenon. Sensitivity analysis of three independent parameters that govern the tensile dynamic behavior of the modified model shows that the fracture strain and dynamic increase factor for tension are crucial for the correct modeling of the scabbing phenomenon, and the dynamic increase factor for tension as well as the ratio of the current meridian to the compressive meridian are important for the simulation of the cratering phenomenon. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available