4.7 Article

Experimental comparison of energy absorption characteristics of polyurethane foam-filled magnesium and steel beams in bending

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 76-87

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.02.006

Keywords

Magnesium alloy; Polyurethane foam; Thin-walled beam; Energy absorption; Bending collapse

Funding

  1. DLR project Next Generation Car

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lightweight magnesium alloys and polyurethane foams have attracted much attention in the automotive industry due to their potential to reduce vehicle weight. This study conducted quasi-static/dynamic three-point bending tests to investigate the energy absorption characteristics and deformation behaviour of empty and polyurethane foam-filled magnesium alloy AZ31B thin-walled beams, and to make comparisons with mild steel DC04 beams. The results showed that both deformation/fracture modes and energy absorption capacity of the thin-walled beams subjected to bending loads depend on the strain rate and other parameters, such as the beam material's strength and ductility, foam density and wall thickness. Both the DC04 beams and AZ31B extruded beams showed a positive effect of strain rate on the energy absorption capacity. A beam filled with a higher density foam achieves higher bending resistance, but fractures at a smaller deflection. The experiments demonstrated that AZ31B significantly outperforms DC04 in terms of energy absorption and specific energy absorption for the foam-filled beams, when the beams are subjected to bending loads at a deflection of 250 mm. However, this gain could be weakened when the performance is assessed at a larger fracture deflection because the foam-filled AZ31B beams tend to fracture at smaller deflections. For applications that require limited deformation, there is a possibility to develop lightweight auto-body structures such as rocker rails by substituting foam-filled AZ31B structures for mild steel structures, while maintaining or exceeding their current crashworthiness and safety. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available