4.7 Article

Electrically conductive polymer composite containing hybrid graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes: synergistic effect and tunable conductivity anisotropy

Journal

ADVANCED COMPOSITES AND HYBRID MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 250-262

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42114-021-00332-y

Keywords

Conductive polymer composite; Graphene nanoplatelets; Carbon nanotubes; Synergistic effect; Anisotropy

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synergistic effect of pristine carbon nanotubes and functionalized carbon nanotubes in conductive poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene nanoplatelet composites was studied, showing different behaviors in in-plane and perpendicular directions. A schematic diagram explaining the evolution of 3D conductive pathways at different ratios was presented.
Pristine carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and functionalized carbon nanotubes (f-CNTs) were introduced into conductive poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene nanoplatelet (PMMA/GNP) composites to achieve a synergistic effect in the enhancement of the conductivity and the reduction in the percolation threshold by forming a 3-Dimensional(3-D) hybrid structure. Both the in-plane and perpendicular electrical properties were investigated. The synergies of hybrid fillers in the in-plane direction were more dependent on the total filler loading, while those in the perpendicular direction were significantly influenced by the GNP/CNT or GNP/f-CNT ratios. Typically, a schematic diagram of the evolution of the 3-D conductive pathways of PMMA/GNP/f-CNT composite at different GNP/f-CNT ratios was presented to explain this phenomenon. Moreover, tunable conductivity anisotropy (defined as the ratio of in-plane conductivity to perpendicular conductivity) ranging from 0.01 to 1000 was achieved, simply by constructing different conductive structures at various filler loadings or ratios in composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available