4.6 Article

An integrated approach of reservoir characterization of Y gas field in Central Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-022-01470-9

Keywords

Facies; Volume in place; Deep marine environment; 13AT1; 10AT1; South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study fills the knowledge gap in the Bredasdorp Basin Offshore South Africa by analyzing the sandstone reservoir characteristics. The results show that medium-grained sandstone (facies 3) has the best reservoir quality, while claystone (facies 1) has the least quality. Based on the findings, further oil and gas development should focus on the eastern part of the Y gas field.
The study attempts to address the knowledge gap in the Bredasdorp Basin Offshore South Africa by using newly acquired seismic data with an enhanced resolution, integrating core and well log to provide a solution. The main objective of this study was a volumetric sandstone reservoir characterization of the 13At1 and 10At1 sandstones deposited in the upper shallow marine environment. The results reveal four facies grouped as facies 1(claystone), facies 2(intercalation of claystone and sandstone, facies 3(medium sandstone), and facies 4 fine-medium sandstone grain deposited in a deep marine environment. Facies 3, the medium-grained sandstone, has the best reservoir quality rock, while facies 1, which is predominantly claystone, has the least rock quality. The study has produced a calculated volume of gas in the 10At1 sand (upper and lower sand is 30.01 billion cubic feet (bcf)) higher than that of the 13At1 sand (27.22 bcf of gas). Improved seismic resolution enhanced the accuracy of results. It is advisable to focus further field development in the eastern part of the Y gas field because of good reservoir quality and production developed due to the sand in the 10At1 sequence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available