4.6 Article

Mechanistic study of nanoparticles-assisted xanthan gum polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery: a comparative study

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-021-01334-8

Keywords

Xanthan gum; Polymer; Enhanced oil recovery; Rheology; Nanoparticles

Funding

  1. [JS-JPPT-PEPT-0921]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the application of nanoparticle-stabilized xanthan gum in oil recovery, demonstrating that nanoparticles can enhance the viscosity of polymeric nanofluids and reduce the interfacial tension of oil/brine interface, thereby increasing oil recovery efficiency.
Recently, nanoparticle additives have been used to improve stability and hence efficiency of chemicals during enhanced oil recovery. Herein, a comparative analysis of the application of nanoparticle-stabilized xanthan gum for oil recovery applications was investigated. The nanoparticles used as additives are silicon oxide (SiO2), metallic aluminium oxide (Al2O3), and titanium oxide (TiO2). Rheological measurements were carried out to examine the shear viscosity of the polymeric nanofluids under a range of salinity typical of reservoir conditions. Interfacial tension (IFT) experiment was conducted using Kruss tensiometer. Oil displacement studies were carried out to examine the incremental recovery factor of the polymeric nanofluids. The polymeric nanofluids exhibited better rheological behaviour compared to bare xanthan gum (XG) polymer. At 0.5 wt.% nanoparticle concentration, 0.5 wt.% polymer concentration, shearing rate of 10 s(-1), and 3 wt.% NaCl concentration, rheology result shows that the shear viscosity of SiO2-XG, Al2O3-XG, and TiO2-XG is 423 mPa.s, 299 mPa.s, and 293 mPa.s, respectively. Moreover, the polymeric nanofluids lowered the IFT of the oil/brine interface due to adsorption at the nanoparticles at the interface. Finally, oil displacement result confirms that the incremental oil recovery after water flooding by Al2O3-XG, TiO2-XG, and SiO2-XG is 28.4%, 27.6%, and 25.2%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available