4.5 Article

3TM: Software for the 3-Tau Model

Journal

SOFTWAREX
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.100979

Keywords

FFC-NMR dispersion curves; Least squares minimization; 3-Tau Model; T-1/T-2 ratio

Funding

  1. European Union [764691]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [764691] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of Fast Field Cycling-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance dispersion curves provides fundamental information about the dynamics of fluid protons within a confined environment and the structure of porous media. A software called 3TM, based on the 3-Tau model, is developed to facilitate the comparison of different models and promote its application in various types of porous media.
The analysis of the Fast Field Cycling-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance dispersion curves (FFC-NMRD) of H-1 nuclei provides fundamental information about the dynamics of fluid protons within a confined environment as well as information on the structure of the porous media. Extracting this information from FFC-NMRD curves requires the use of models which describe the dynamical behaviour of pair of spins through a set of physical parameters. Despite the large number of models available, a very few are accessible to those unfamiliar with programming languages. Those models that are accessible through simplified equations tend to yield limited information. This work presents a simple-to-use software, called 3TM, based on the 3-Tau Model, to stimulate the comparison between different models, and to encourage its application and extension to different types of porous media. The 3TM software provides best-fit solutions in terms of physical parameters using a least-squares minimization algorithm of an objective function. It yields a range of physical parameters which are presented and discussed. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available