4.7 Article

Hofmann-Type Metal-Organic Framework Nanosheets for Oxygen Evolution

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 14161-14168

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c03619

Keywords

Hofmann-type metal-organic framework; two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets; oxygen evolution reaction; electrocatalyst

Funding

  1. NSFC [22072063, 21373110]
  2. MSTC [2020YFE0100100]
  3. Department of Science and Technology of Hubei Province [2019CFB365]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focused on developing a unique Fe-Ni Hofmann-type MOF with superior activity for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), achieving an overpotential of 290 mV at a current density of 10 mA/cm² and a Tafel slope of 44 mV/dec. This performance, combined with outstanding durability, makes it the best among known Hofmann-type MOFs for the OER to date.
Developing an efficient and low-cost electrocatalyst is important in energy conversion and storage, while it is challenging especially in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) owing to the sluggish kinetic process. Hofmann-type metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are layer-structured materials, and if they are synthesized in the form of regular-shaped and slim nanosheets, a higher density of exposed active sites and easier electron and mass transport will be expected. In the current study, we prepared such a type of Hofmann MOFs plus Ni site tuning for the OER. The characterizations verified the successful material synthesis and characteristics. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations proved that the Ni site modified by Fe atom is more efficient for the critical OH* as well as O* intermediate formation. Taking advantage of the designed unique structure configuration, the as-obtained Fe-Ni Hofmann-type MOF showed the OER activity with an overpotential of 290 mV at the current density of 10 mA cm(-2) and a Tafel slope of 44 mV dec(-1), the very best performance plus outstanding durability among the Hofmann-type MOFs for the OER known to date.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available