4.5 Article

A gamified mobile health intervention for children in day surgery care: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Journal

NURSING OPEN
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 1465-1476

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1143

Keywords

anxiety; children; pain; protocol; randomized controlled trial; web-based mobile health intervention

Categories

Funding

  1. Business Finland
  2. Finnish Funding agency
  3. Clinical Research Institute HUCH
  4. Research Foundation of Mannerheim League for Child Welfare in Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a gamified mobile health intervention for children in whole day surgery care. Participants will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, with a focus on children's pre-operative anxiety and other outcomes.
Aims: To describe a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial which will evaluate the effectiveness of a gamified mobile health intervention for children in whole day surgery care. Design: A study protocol for a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (N = 62), in which patients receive routine care and play a mobile game designed for children or the control group (N = 62), in which patients receive routine care, including a mobile phone application that supports parents during the care path. The primary outcome is children's pre-operative anxiety, while the secondary outcome measures included fear and postoperative pain, along with parental satisfaction and anxiety. Data collection started in August 2020. Results: The results of the ongoing randomized controlled trial will determine whether the developed gamified mobile health intervention can be recommended for hospital use, and whether it could be used to educate children about their surgical treatment to decrease anxiety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available