4.7 Review

A review on kinetic models and corresponding analysis methods for hydrogen storage materials

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 41, Issue 40, Pages 18072-18087

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.018

Keywords

Hydrogen storage materials; Kinetic model; Hydrogenation and dehydrogenation mechanisms

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51222402, 51501107]
  2. Shu Guang project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation [13SG39]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571541, 2016T90362]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation behaviors by kinetic models is an efficient approach to the in-depth understanding of the kinetic mechanism for hydrogen storage materials. A large number of kinetic models as well as analysis methods based on these models have been extensively applied in hydrogen storage materials, and kinetic parameters with physical interpretations are determined to reveal the kinetic mechanism of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions. However, the assumptions and derivation steps of these models are usually difficult to find, and the selection of analysis methods is sometimes confusing. Moreover, some recently proposed models and analysis methods have not been introduced to investigate the kinetic mechanism of hydrogen storage materials yet. These problems significantly prevent the kinetic models as well as analysis methods from further revealing the kinetic mechanism for hydrogen storage materials. Therefore, this review mainly focuses on the illustration of the assumptions and derivation steps of the kinetic models, summarization of corresponding analysis methods, and introduction of some recently proposed kinetic models and analysis methods for hydrogen storage materials. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available