4.7 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic activity of nanostructured Fe doped CeO2 for hydrogen production under visible light irradiation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 41, Issue 32, Pages 14133-14146

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.191

Keywords

Fe doped ceria; Band edge shifting; Interfacial charge transfer; Photocurrent; Hydrogen production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of Fe-doped CeO2 nanoparticles were synthesised by simple co-precipitation technique by varying the dopant concentration (0 >= 5%) for photocatalytic water decomposition under visible light irradiation. The prepared photocatalysts were characterized by crystallographic, microscopic and spectroscopic methods to investigate the cause of their robust photocatalytic activity. XRD pattern suggest the formation highly crystalline face centered cubic-fluorite structure of as-synthesized nanoparticles. The doping amount of Fe in CeO2 lattice strongly affects the bandgap tuning of neat CeO2 (CFO) from UV to Visible region i.e. 3.0eV-1.85 eV. The successful doping of Fe in CeO2 lattice resulted in the formation new dopant energy levels that facilitates interfacial charge transfer of both electron (e(-)) and hole (h(+)) for better photoredox reaction of water under visible light irradiation. Further, BET surface area measurement, PL, TRPL and photoelectrochemical analysis reveals that, presence of Fe3+ ion in ceria lattice causes an enhancement of surface area, low PL intensity, longer average decay time (value of (tau) for CFO and CF3 is 2.13 and 4.16 ns, respectively) and high photocurrent generation. The CF3 sample exhibits 31 times more current generation than CFO and showed highest amount of hydrogen production i.e. 641 mu mol/h with an apparent conversion efficiency of 9.13%. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available