4.4 Editorial Material

Living systematic reviews in rehabilitation science can improve evidence-based healthcare

Journal

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01857-5

Keywords

Systematic review; Living systematic review; Rehabilitation; Chronic pain; Methods; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systematic reviews are struggling to keep up with the growing rate of clinical trials, but living systematic reviews offer a potential solution by continuously updating new evidence. They have the potential to be applied not only in rapidly emerging topics but also in slower developing domains like rehabilitation science.
Although systematic reviews are considered as central components in evidence-based practice, they currently face an important challenge to keep up with the exponential publication rate of clinical trials. After initial publication, only a minority of the systematic reviews are updated, and it often takes multiple years before these results become accessible. Consequently, many systematic reviews are not up to date, thereby increasing the time-gap between research findings and clinical practice. A potential solution is offered by a living systematic reviews approach. These types of studies are characterized by a workflow of continuous updates which decreases the time it takes to disseminate new findings. Although living systematic reviews are specifically designed to continuously synthesize new evidence in rapidly emerging topics, they have also considerable potential in slower developing domains, such as rehabilitation science. In this commentary, we outline the rationale and required steps to transition a regular systematic review into a living systematic review. We also propose a workflow that is designed for rehabilitation science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available