4.4 Article

The Role of Hounsfield Unit in Intraoperative Endplate Violation and Delayed Cage Subsidence with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

Journal

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 1829-1839

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/21925682211052515

Keywords

lumbar; cage; subsidence; Hounsfield unit; endplate violation; oblique lateral interbody fusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative endplate violations and delayed cage subsidence in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery, as well as the association between low Hounsfield unit (HU) values and these complications. The results showed that intraoperative endplate violations and delayed cage subsidence are not uncommon in OLIF surgery, and HU values can serve as good predictors for these complications.
Study Design: Retrospective clinical case series. Objectives: To investigate the risk factors for intraoperative endplate violations and delayed cage subsidence after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery. Secondly, to examine whether low Hounsfield unit (HU) values at different regions of the endplate are associated with intraoperative endplate violation or delayed cage subsidence. Methods: 61 patients (aged 65.1 +/- 9.5 years; 107 segments) who underwent OLIF with or without posterior instrumentation from May 2015 to April 2019 were retrospectively studied. Intraoperative endplate violation was measured on sagittal reconstructed computerized tomography (CT) images immediate postoperatively, while delayed cage subsidence was evaluated using lateral radiographs and defined at I -month follow-up or later. Demographic information and clinical parameters such as age, body mass index, bone mineral density, number of surgical levels, cage dimension, disc height restoration, visual analogue scale (VAS), and HU at different regions of the endplate were obtained. Results: Total postoperative cage subsidence was identified in 45 surgical levels (42.0%) in 26 patients (42.6%) up till postoperative I-year follow-up. Low HU value at the ipsilateral epiphyseal ring was an independent risk factor for intraoperative endplate violation (P = .008) with a cut-off value of 326.21 HUs. Low HU values at the central endplate had a significant correlation with delayed cage subsidence in stand-alone cases (P = .013) with a cut-off value of 296.42 HUs. VAS scores were not different at 1 week postoperatively in cases with or without intraoperative endplate violation (3.12 +/- .73 vs 2.89 +/- .72, P = .166) and showed no difference at 1 year with or without delayed cage subsidence (1.95 +/- .60 vs 2.26 +/- .85, P = .173). Conclusions: Intraoperative endplate violation and delayed cage subsidence are not uncommon with OLIF surgery. HUs of the endplate are good predictors for intraoperative endplate violation and cage subsidence since they can represent the regional bone quality of the endplate in contact with the implant. VAS improvements were not affected by intraoperative endplate violation or delayed cage subsidence at 1-year follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available