4.4 Article

Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia

Journal

EFSA JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068

Keywords

Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia; Disease control measures; Mycoplasma capricolum subsp; capripneumoniae; sampling procedures; monitoring period; protection zone; surveillance zone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EFSA was mandated by the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of control measures against Category A diseases. This opinion focuses on the control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP), including sampling procedures, monitoring periods, protection and surveillance zones, and duration of measures. The recommendations aim to support legislative drafting and ad hoc requests related to CCPP.
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones and iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as effective in affected areas where high awareness is expected, and when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, a surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective based on expert knowledge, while a protection zone should also be developed to include establishments adjacent to affected ones. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CCPP. (C) 2022 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available