4.6 Review

Retinal Progression Biomarkers of Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12010036

Keywords

age related macular degeneration (AMD); drusen; color fundus photography; optical coherence tomography; OCT-angiography; progression biomarkers

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia project [PTDC/MED-PAT/30385/2017]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia/Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia, Portugal - FEDER [UIDB/04462/2020]
  3. FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early and intermediate AMD patients have varying risks of disease progression, highlighting the importance of predictive biomarkers. Traditional clinical parameters have been replaced by multimodal retinal assessment, which provides more accurate image biomarkers.
Early and intermediate AMD patients represent a heterogeneous population with an important but variable risk of progression to more advanced stages of the disease. The five-year progression from early and intermediate AMD to late disease is known to range from 0.4% to 53%. This wide variation explains the particular interest in searching predictive AMD biomarkers. Clinical parameters such as drusen size, presence of pigmentary abnormalities, and fellow eye status were, traditionally, the more important predictive elements. Multimodal retinal assessment (Color Fundus Photography, Optical Coherence Tomography, Optical Coherence Angiography and Fundus Autofluorescence) is providing new and accurate image biomarkers, useful in research and in daily practice. If individual progression risk could be anticipated, then management plans should be adapted accordingly, considering follow-up intervals and therapeutic interventions. Here, we reviewed the most important image progression biomarkers of early and intermediate AMD with relevant interest in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available