4.6 Article

Cyclomodulins and Hemolysis in E. coli as Potential Low-Cost Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life11111165

Keywords

colorectal cancer; screening; genotoxin; colibactin; cytotoxic necrotizing factor

Funding

  1. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc [IGA_LF_2021_022]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic [DRO 61989592]
  3. Ministry of Health, Czech Republic [DROFNOl 00098892, NV19-03-00069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The frequent occurrence of cyclomodulin-positive E. coli in CRC patients provides the opportunity to use them as CRC screening markers; a significant association was found between CRC and the presence of colibactin genes clbB and clbN, the cnf gene, and hemolytic phenotype in E. coli isolates; colibactin gene assay may serve as an auxiliary marker to increase the specificity and/or sensitivity of FIT in CRC screening.
The frequent occurrence of E. coli positive for cyclomodulins such as colibactin (CLB), the cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF), and the cytolethal distending factor (CDT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients published so far provides the opportunity to use them as CRC screening markers. We examined the practicability and performance of a low-cost detection approach that relied on culture followed by simplified DNA extraction and PCR in E. coli isolates recovered from 130 CRC patients and 111 controls. Our results showed a statistically significant association between CRC and the presence of colibactin genes clbB and clbN, the cnf gene, and newly, the hemolytic phenotype of E. coli isolates. We also observed a significant increase in the mean number of morphologically distinct E. coli isolates per patient in the CRC cohort compared to controls, indicating that the cyclomodulin-producing E. coli strains may represent potentially preventable harmful newcomers in CRC patients. A colibactin gene assay showed the highest detection rate (45.4%), and males would benefit from the screening more than females. However, because of the high number of false positives, practical use of this marker must be explored. In our opinion, it may serve as an auxiliary marker to increase the specificity and/or sensitivity of the well-established fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in CRC screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available