4.6 Article

Bots in software engineering: a systematic mapping study

Journal

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.866

Keywords

Bots; Software engineering; BotSE; Conversational AI; Digital assistants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the recent advances in machine learning, natural language processing, and understanding techniques, bots have transitioned from research prototypes to deployable systems in software engineering. This comprehensive study aims to categorize and provide an overview of bots used in software engineering, considering their applications, characteristics, and the perception of the developer community.
Bots have emerged from research prototypes to deployable systems due to the recent developments in machine learning, natural language processing and understanding techniques. In software engineering, bots range from simple automated scripts to decision-making autonomous systems. The spectrum of applications of bots in software engineering is so wide and diverse, that a comprehensive overview and categorization of such bots is needed. Existing works considered selective bots to be analyzed and failed to provide the overall picture. Hence it is significant to categorize bots in software engineering through analyzing why, what and how the bots are applied in software engineering. We approach the problem with a systematic mapping study based on the research articles published in this topic. This study focuses on classification of bots used in software engineering, the various dimensions of the characteristics, the more frequently researched area, potential research spaces to be explored and the perception of bots in the developer community. This study aims to provide an introduction and a broad overview of bots used in software engineering. Discussions of the feedback and results from several studies provide interesting insights and prospective future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available