4.5 Article

Thermodynamic Modeling and Performance Analysis of Vehicular High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System

Journal

MEMBRANES
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes12010072

Keywords

HT-PEMFC; thermodynamic modeling; powertrain design; exergy analysis; energy analysis

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University [GXL2018004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A thermodynamic model of a vehicular high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) system using phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole membrane is developed, and the effects of stack inlet temperature, pressure, and stoichiometric on system performance are analyzed.
Since the high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFC) stack require a range of auxiliary equipments to maintain operating conditions, it is necessary to consider operation of related components in the design of HT-PEMFC systems. In this paper, a thermodynamic model of a vehicular HT-PEMFC system using phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole membrane is developed. The power distribution and exergy loss of each component are derived according to thermodynamic analysis, where the stack and heat exchanger are the two components with the greatest exergy loss. In addition, ecological functions and improvement potentials are proposed to evaluate the system performance better. On this basis, the effects of stack inlet temperature, pressure, and stoichiometric on system performance are analyzed. The results showed that the energy efficiency, exergy efficiency and net output power of the system achieved the maximum when the inlet gases temperature is 406.1 K. The system performance is better when the cathode inlet pressure is relatively low and the anode inlet pressure is relatively high. Moreover, the stoichiometry should be reduced to improve the system output performance on the basis of ensuring sufficient gases reaction in the stack.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available