4.6 Review

Multimodal molecular imaging evaluation for early diagnosis and prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01147-7

Keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma; Molecular imaging; Nuclear medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Optical imaging

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Provincial Health Commission [19PJ151]
  2. Luzhou people's Government-Southwest Medical University Joint Project [2019LZXNYDZ04]
  3. Central Government Funds of Guiding Local Scientific and Technological Development for Sichuan Province of China [2021ZYD0075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), an aggressive and deadly cancer, poses challenges in early diagnosis. Molecular imaging, a noninvasive diagnostic method that allows visualization of biological events at the cellular and molecular level, shows promise in CCA. This review discusses various molecular imaging techniques for CCA and explores the challenges and future directions in this field.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with limited therapeutic options. Despite recent advances in diagnostic imaging for CCA, the early diagnosis of CCA and evaluation of tumor invasion into the bile duct and its surrounding tissues remain challenging. Most patients with CCA are diagnosed at an advanced stage, at which treatment options are limited. Molecular imaging is a promising diagnostic method for noninvasive imaging of biological events at the cellular and molecular level in vivo. Molecular imaging plays a key role in the early diagnosis, staging, and treatment-related evaluation and management of cancer. This review will describe different methods for molecular imaging of CCA, including nuclear medicine, magnetic resonance imaging, optical imaging, and multimodal imaging. The main challenges and future directions in this field are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available