4.6 Article

Fulminant Giant Cell Myocarditis vs. Lymphocytic Myocarditis: A Comparison of Their Clinical Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.770549

Keywords

fulminant myocarditis; giant cell myocarditis; lymphocytic myocarditis; myocardial biopsy; heart transplantation; outcome

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81974042]
  2. Clinical and Translational Medicine Research Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2019XK320058]
  3. Special Research on Basic Resources of Science and Technology [2018FY100606]
  4. National Multidisciplinary Cooperative Diagnosis and Treatment Capacity-Building Project for Major Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes in patients with fulminant giant cell myocarditis (FGCM) and fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM). The results showed that patients with FGCM had milder inflammatory responses and myocardial damage compared to those with FLM, but had poorer prognoses. hs-CRP levels could serve as a promising prognostic biomarker and an appropriate cutoff point for differentiating between FGCM and FLM patients.
Objectives: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a rapidly progressive and frequently fatal form of myocarditis that has been difficult to classify. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes in patients with fulminant giant cell myocarditis (FGCM) and fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM).Methods and Results: In our retrospective study, nine patients with FGCM (mean age 47.9 +/- 7.5 years, six female) and 7 FLM (mean age 42.1 +/- 12.3 years, four female) patients confirmed by histology in the last 11 years were included. Most patients with FGCM and FLM were NYHA functional class IV (56 vs. 100%, p = 0.132). Patients with FGCM had significantly lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP, 4.4 (2.0-10.2) mg/L vs. 13.6 (12.6-14.6) mg/L, P = 0.004, data shown as the median with IQR], creatine kinase-myoglobin [CK-MB, 1.4 (1.0-3.2) ng/ml vs. 14.6 (3.0-64.9) ng/ml, P = 0.025, median with IQR], and alanine aminotransferase [ALT, 38.0 (25.0-61.5) IU/L vs. 997.0 (50.0-3,080.0) IU/L, P = 0.030, median with IQR] and greater right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) [2.9 +/- 0.3 cm vs. 2.4 +/- 0.6 cm, P = 0.034, mean +/- SD] than those with FLM. No differences were observed in the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (44 vs. 43%, p = 1.000) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11 vs. 43%, p = 0.262) between the two groups. The long-term survival rate was significantly lower in FGCM group compared with FLM group (0 vs. 71.4%, p = 0.022). A multivariate cox regression analysis showed the level of hs-CRP (hazard ratio = 0.871, 95% confidence interval: 0.761-0.996, P = 0.043) was an independent prognostic factor for FM patients. Furthermore, the level of hs-CRP had a good ability to discriminate between patients with FGCM and FLM (AUC = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.4213-0.9964).Conclusions: The inflammatory response and myocardial damage in the patients with FGCM were milder than those with FLM. Patients with FGCM had distinctly poorer prognoses compared with those with FLM. Our results suggest that hs-CRP could be a promising prognostic biomarker and a hs-CRP level of 11.71 mg/L is an appropriate cutoff point for the differentiating diagnosis between patients with FGCM and FLM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available