Journal
CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101562
Keywords
Coal-fired power plants; Ultra-low emission; Wet limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization; SO3 removal efficiency; Emission characteristics
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076191]
- Key Science and Technology Projects of China Huadian Group Co., Ltd. [CHDKJ20-01-69]
- Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ21D050002]
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Cornell University [2021QNA4011]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper investigates the removal and emission characteristics of SOx (SO2 and SO3) in wet limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) based on data collected from 95 ultra-low emission coal-fired power units. The study shows that the overall removal efficiency of single absorber is above 97.5%, with the SO3 removal efficiency between 31% and 70%. Installation of inner structures in the spray absorber shows a more obvious correlation between inlet SO2 concentration and SOx removal efficiency.
In this paper, SOx (SO2 and SO3) removal and emission characteristics of wet limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) are investigated based on the data collected from 95 ultra-low emission coal-fired power units. The study shows that the overall removal efficiency of singleabsorber is above 97.5%, in which the SO3 removal efficiency is between 31% and 70%. When the inner structures are installed into the spray absorber, the correlation between the inlet SO2 concentration and SOx removal efficiency becomes more obvious, however, with a tray absorber, the maximum SO2 removal efficiency of double-absorber reaches 99.74%, in which the SO3 removal efficiency is between 27% and 81%. With a normal spray absorber, the higher inlet concentration, the higher removal efficiency it reaches, while with a tray absorber, the result is opposite. With a single-absorber, there is little correlation between flue gas temperature drop and SO2 removal efficiency. Large temperature drop harms the improvement of overall SO2 removal efficiency but is beneficial to SO3 removal. By the calculation of 50 x emission performance model, average emission performances of SO2 and SO3 are acquired, which are about 90-107 mg/ (kWh) and 81-97 mg/(kWh), respectively.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available