4.5 Review

Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review

Journal

GLOBAL CHALLENGES
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202100110

Keywords

formaldehyde scavengers; insulation; mineral wool; phenolic resins; thermoset

Funding

  1. Innovate UK [11334, 511440]
  2. Superglass Insulation Ltd.
  3. European Regional Development Fund [OC15R19P]
  4. British Ramsay Memorial Trust
  5. UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship [MR/T042710/1]
  6. Innovate UK [511440] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulating materials are crucial for energy efficiency in buildings, and mineral wool insulation (MWI) is the most commonly used type in Europe. However, the traditional phenol-formaldehyde-urea (PFU) binder used in MWI has raised concerns due to formaldehyde emissions. This review explores alternative binder technologies that aim to minimize or eliminate formaldehyde emissions.
Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in Europe and account for more than 50% of the total market by volume. MWI typically consists of two key components: a mesh of inorganic fibers that are several micrometers in diameter, and an organic thermosetting adhesive commonly referred to as the binder. Traditional phenol-formaldehydeurea (PFU) binders used in the manufacture of MWI are increasingly being scrutinized for the formaldehyde released during their manufacture and service lifetime. The recent classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen by various safety organizations has accelerated a paradigm shift within the industry toward alternative binder technologies that minimize or indeed eliminate formaldehyde emissions. This review examines more recent strategies for achieving low- or zero-added formaldehyde binders for MWI, with a particular focus on the patent literature. The chemistry underpinning traditional PFU binders is presented and compared to new strategies involving scavenging molecules that decrease formaldehyde emissions, as well as zero-added formaldehyde binder technologies such as polyester, Maillard, and epoxide thermosets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available