4.7 Article

Biased β-Agonists Favoring Gs over β-Arrestin for Individualized Treatment of Obstructive Lung Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030331

Keywords

beta(2)-adrenergic receptor; tachyphylaxis; G protein; desensitization; airway smooth muscle; G-protein-coupled receptor kinases

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL114471, HL142992, HL045967, HL155532]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Signals from G-protein-coupled receptors are frequently targeted in therapeutics. Biased agonists that favor Gs coupling over β-arrestin binding could provide personalized therapy for obstructive lung diseases.
Signals from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most frequently targeted pathways of currently prescribed therapeutics. Rather than being a simple switch, it is now evident that a given receptor can directly initiate multiple signals, and biasing to achieve signal selectivity based on agonist structure is possible. Biased agonists could direct therapeutically favorable pathways while avoiding counterproductive or adverse reaction pathways. For obstructive lung diseases, beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2) AR) agonists act at these receptors on airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells to open the airways by relaxing ASM, improving airflow and morbidity. However, these receptors signal to the G protein Gs (increasing cAMP and promoting relaxation), but also to beta-arrestin (promoting desensitization and a loss of effectiveness). Indeed, beta-agonist use is associated with adverse events in asthma pathogenesis and clinical outcomes which are related to desensitization. beta-agonists favoring Gs coupling over beta-arrestin binding would provide a means of tailoring bronchodilator therapy. In this review, we show how combinatorial methods with a 40 million compound agnostic library led to a new class of biased beta-agonists that do not desensitize, providing an opportunity to personalize therapy in patients who experience poor efficacy or adverse effects from traditional balanced agonists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available